Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:USA 10096-7-8 HDR Antelope Canyon Luca Galuzzi 2007.jpg

Upper Antelope Canyon

 * Reason:True we already have an FP of Lower Antelope Canyon, but this one is of higher res, has a person for scale and IMO depicts a more interesting scene. Technical quality is also very good in terms of sharpness and handling of the challenging lighting involved.
 * Articles this image appears in:Antelope Canyon
 * Creator:Lucag


 * Support as nominator Fir0002 11:42, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Looks so unbelievably great that it looks fake. Good quality. – sgeureka t•c 12:18, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Well done. —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 21:46, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Support. Some technical problems, but who cares, it looks stunning. &mdash; BRIAN 0918 &bull; 2007-12-22 21:47Z
 * Support. Well done. - Darwinek (talk) 10:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Perhaps you could fit it into erosion, too?--HereToHelp 21:19, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Support - One word: Beautiful. Booksworm Sprechen-sie Koala? 10:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Support. Reminds me of Petra! Although the ground looks a little funky in full dimension, it's still awesome. Nice job.--DMCer (talk) 12:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Support, I can't believe this isn't a FP already. --Aqwis (talk – contributions) 13:47, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Support Very beautiful picture, amazing quality, nice all around. S♦s♦e♦b♦a♦l♦l♦o♦s  ( Merry Christmas! ) 17:59, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Wow H92110 (talk) 14:20, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Support--Mbz1 (talk) 05:48, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Support While encyclopedic, the technical issues due to the subtle hues of the stone and the overall "brownish" color are noticeable to the trained eye. -- Shark face  217  23:47, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

MER-C 02:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)