Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Ulysses Grant 1870-1880.jpg

Ulysses S. Grant
A Commons Featured Picture of the 18th President of the United States, Ulysses S. Grant, taken sometime between 1870 and 1880. Note the clarity on his face.
 * Nominate and support.  howch e  ng   {chat} 23:53, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Support encyclopedic, clear, striking, great-quality. What more to say? —Jared Hunt September 12, 2006, 00:28 (UTC)
 * Support good quality for an image so old. Gnangarra 01:42, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Wow, what a dusty shoulder! HighInBC 02:20, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Considering the time period, a great image; very encyclopedic. -- Tewy  03:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Notable historical figure. Good pic. --Billpg 03:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Support per all above. A photogenic fellow, he was. --Bridgecross 04:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support Looks good --Fir0002 10:59, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose. How about doing something about all that dandruff... ;-) To me, it looks like the background and some other parts of the photo have been cleaned up, but dust spots and blemishes are very prominent in other places. --Janke | Talk 13:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. It's all been said. Nauticashades 17:20, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I will for sure support if we can do a little cleanup. Is it possible? (The dust on the image) Arad 04:09, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Classic photograph. Those spots appear to be water stains on a wool suit rather than dandruff. Could use a little dust and scratches cleanup, though. --S0uj1r0 04:13, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Too historical NegativeNed 16:06, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * User only has votes on his or her user page, talk page, and Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. See Special:Contributions/NegativeNed. -- Tewy  23:39, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * How can something be "too historical", anyway? Nauticashades 07:35, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, duh! Anything that's a historical photo is too historical.  In order from least historical to most historical: A picture of a dead president.  A picture of a wagon wheel.  A picture of Shakespeare riding a dinosaur.  A picture of Buddha listening to Nirvana on his iPod.  A picture of a caveman dragging Wonder Woman by her hair to his cave.  Get with the program! :^P -- Moondigger 17:40, 16 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Support. Nice image -- good technical quality considering the era; historical value. -- Moondigger 17:40, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Nice. My only quibble is with the caption "...sometime between 1870 and 1880". Surely can't it be dated a bit more precisely? I mean it's not simply some random old photo of just anybody. For some reason I have a feeling this shot dates from his Presidency, but I don't have any evidence for that to hand (and admittedly it only slightly reduces the date spread anyway). --jjron 12:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Since this an historical photo, I would oppose any photoshopping of the image. I think is it is very good just the way it is.  I agree with Jjron that it could be dated a little more accurately --rogerd 23:54, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, the Library of Congress isn't any more specific than that.  howch e  ng   {chat} 02:43, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Too bad, thanks for checking. --rogerd 15:45, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Support - One of the best black and white photographs that exist. In my opinion, history adds quality to a picture. --Ineffable3000 02:18, 20 September 2006 (UTC)