Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Indian Blackbird

Indian Blackbird
Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2013 at 08:56:51 (UTC)
 * Reason:good quality and high EV
 * Articles in which this image appears:Common Blackbird, List of birds of Sweden, List of birds of Andhra Pradesh
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
 * Creator:Andreas Trepte


 * Support as nominator --BNK(talk) 08:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Neutral - It's a nice picture, but the cropping (not sure whether it was cropped) seems a little too tight for me. Arctic Kangaroo  (  ✉  •  ✎  ) 09:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Support Meets the criteria, and the standards for birds. Cowtowner (talk) 16:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Support Crop doesn't bother me, especially at full size. I get the impression the worm is about to perform surprise sutemi-waza on that poor bird. – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 00:02, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak support. Overfeatured category.TCO (talk) 14:27, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * That's an unfair reason to half-support someone's image, which should stand of its own accord as it would on its own article. – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 14:57, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually, that's not a reason at all. What do you propose? We feature no more birds until we have an equivalent number of, say, molluscs? Cowtowner (talk) 16:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey, what about us unicellular organisms? :-) Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 01:59, 16 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak oppose. Uninspiring crop and a very common bird, so definitely replaceable. Good quality and a decent pose, though. The maggot adds EV. J Milburn (talk) 15:11, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Support I partially agree with Milburn, but there's only so much you can do and keep the image encyclopedic - too dramatic, and you need another image to show key features. So I'm fine with this. Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:55, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Support Tomer T (talk) 07:23, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 18:19, 20 June 2013 (UTC)