Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Intentionally blank page

Intentionally blank page


High resolution, catches the eye in its own unique way, and illustrates its article perfectly. Specifically, it illustrates the counter-refuting method used in the SAT. Rather than leave the page entirely blank (and leave the nervous student worrying that he got a defective test), and rather than add a self-refuting message like "This page is intentionally left blank", they chose an appropriate alternative.


 * Self-nom. -  BRIAN  0918 21:53, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Does not catch my eye, in fact, it blends in with the background. Alr 22:03, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Very crisp and high contrast, could use a little cropping though. No seriously, you've gotta be kidding! Here is another self-refuting message: I won't even dignify this one with an oppose ;-) --Dschwen 22:13, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Way too striking for me to support. It made me quiver with excitement the moment I saw it, such that I wanted to oppose. enochlau (talk) 23:17, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Whoops,
 * I mean, . Very brave, though.  drumguy 8800  - speak? 01:57, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. I think this one is taking the "...illustrating article content particularly well..." concept a bit too far. Might as well have a a blank box, and link it to the article White. Sorry if that sounds too harsh. -JPM 04:49, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose What I want to know is if the College Board could copyright that page! &#126;MDD4696 05:40, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose, Due to mis-representation: that page is not blank, there's some text on it... --Janke | Talk 06:05, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose This is a joke entry, I assume - Adrian Pingstone 13:18, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Crisp, clean and attractive image. Nice use of colours, there's just something that is bugging me about it...--Ali K 11:06, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose - no, it's not interesting. Surely this was done as a joke? -- Thorpe  | talk 19:20, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: He might have been satirizing how people (myself inclusive) felt about this one, or other similar scenarios. - JPM | 23:36, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong, Strong Oppose You have got to be kidding me. Anchorage 12:09, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose per ugly font gren グレン ? 09:32, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * You don't find serif fonts sexy? enochlau (talk) 23:37, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose, although it is something new on WP:FPC --Chris 73 | Talk 15:29, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose, although it is something new on WP:FPC --Chris 73 | Talk 15:29, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Raven4x4x 08:27, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

