Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Jane Byrne Interchange

Jane Byrne Interchange
Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2022  at 12:17:18 (UTC)
 * Reason:Shows the subject of the article well. More eye-catching than a still photo.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Jane Byrne Interchange
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Places/Urban
 * Creator:Sea Cow


 * Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 12:17, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment There's a lot going for this, but does it seen a bit dark to anyone else, like the Brightness/Contrast is slightly dull? I'll check again when I get home to it less lighting on my tablet, though. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.7% of all FPs 15:39, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Adam, I don't see anything wrong. This FP nom on Commons is pretty much the same and it's passing. Bammesk (talk) 01:15, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * That's edited for color, this isn't. Sea Cow (talk) 01:17, 12 April 2022 (UTC)


 * To be clear, I don't see a large issue on the color with this video, I just am recognizing the difference. Sea Cow (talk) 01:19, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I think Support on the whole. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.7% of all FPs 18:17, 12 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Support.-- Vulp  ❯❯❯  here!  09:58, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Support.--Sea Cow (talk) 13:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment' What standards are we using for this? The initial pan isn't particularly smooth and I see some rolling shutter effects. I don't think we are yet in a position to demand higher than 1080p resolution but is is that a reasonable minimum going forward? What framerate should we be looking for?©Geni (talk) 19:21, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
 * FP criteria isn't specific and not sure noms are the right venue for this. You might want to start a thread at the FPC talk page. Bammesk (talk) 23:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 16:09, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 20:35, 20 April 2022 (UTC)