Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Jean-Honoré Fragonard - The Stolen Kiss.jpg

The stolen kiss by Jean-Honoré Fragonard (late 1780s)
Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2015  at 15:27:10 (UTC)
 * Reason:HQ + EV
 * Articles in which this image appears: The Stolen Kiss (Fragonard), Jean-Honoré Fragonard, Affair, Romance (love) and Falling in love
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
 * Creator:Jean-Honoré Fragonard


 * Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 15:27, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Support I love this one. A great image and very sweet and scandalous. HullIntegrity  \ talk / 15:46, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose - If you're nominating an image to represent the artist, please choose one which is the most representative. The greater the number of articles nominated/featured, the less EV each individual image has. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:48, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Where did you find this rule? please show me and link it. Paintings and photos evaluate here individually not for each painter just one work! Alborzagros (talk) 15:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * You are nominating several paintings by the same artist which do not have EV in and of themselves, but as representations of the artist's style. One painting is sufficient for that. WP:FP? requires an image to "Add significant encyclopedic value to an article and helps readers to understand an article."; "significant" is negated when there are multiple images showing much the same thing. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:57, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Alb, you make me really work hard. OK, write an article, sigh. It is a notable work. Just wonder where to start, really. Hang on, I go for Tizian first.  Hafspajen (talk) 18:30, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Dear Crisco 1492 _ Please show me rule in and type or highlight where is written. Alborzagros (talk) 06:42, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I've already quoted the rule. If you are unable to accept that, that's not my problem. Down below, J. Milburn has already explained my position as well. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:56, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks I didn't mention the text in quotation mark (above) is from WP:FP. I thought that is your words. any way ... This painting Adds significant encyclopedic value to article, Jean-Honoré Fragonard (painter) and helps readers to understand that article. HOW? Blow the painting in the article we can see this words:«The Stolen Kiss, late 1780s, Hermitage Museum, Saint Petersburg» then now we can find out that:
 * One of Fragonard's painting is about The Stolen Kiss.
 * The painting is drawn in late 1780s.
 * It has been maintained in Hermitage Museum, Saint Petersburg. So reply my question:
 * Don't three items above add significant encyclopedic value to painter's article?
 * Don't three items above help readers to understand painter's article?
 * Alborzagros (talk) 11:16, 17 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Support (Possible co-nom if User:Alborzagros agrees, no response yet) I love this one too. Article ready, great image and hope article is also sweet and scandalous. Hafspajen (talk) 03:49, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Striking my oppose !vote. EV is there now. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:59, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * - you would't imagine the hits on internet ... Both serious sites, museums, big newspapers and millions of buy a reproduction of this wonderfull painting - stuff. A real famous painting... [User:Hafspajen
 * Oh, I can imagine. Shame EV can't be measured by potential encyclopedic use, but how the image is used. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:35, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Cry ... The Stolen Kiss (Fragonard) added to Romance (love), Affair and Falling in love too...  if this painting ever get's featured, I want to be credited too by now. I  am having a heck of a time with this nom.  Hafspajen (talk) 17:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC) ,
 * ? Hafspajen (talk) 17:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Support - EV is there and the quality is okay. However, the article still has relatively little on the painting itself, and it would be nice for it to be developed. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:13, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah... I developed it a bit more, too, the painting bit., you didn't answered my question. Do you mind me as co-nom? Feel like I was working more with this like any of my own current ones, wrote article, argued, place them in different other articles to increase EV.... PLEASE? Hafspajen (talk) 21:04, 19 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Support - Good EV now.--Godot13 (talk) 05:49, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 15:28, 26 March 2015 (UTC)