Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Kayleigh Pearson

Kayleigh Pearson

 * Reason:After checking the criteria I believe that the image meets the standards set for a Featured Picture.
 * Articles this image appears in:Kayleigh Pearson
 * Creator:Jimbo online


 * Support as nominator Jimbo[online] 19:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose, busy background, poor lighting. -- Coneslayer (talk) 19:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Agreed. Not bad for a user-shot photo in the article, but not really a FP-quality portrait. Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 19:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose per above comments. Clegs (talk) 23:05, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose as per above. Noodle snacks (talk) 06:12, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose "After checking the criteria I believe that the image meets the standards set for a Featured Picture." I don't. To busy, taken from too high an angle and flash is too strong. Capital photographer (talk) 07:35, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose Obvious fail here, but that is not to say that I didn't thoroughly enjoy this picture. smooth0707  (talk) 15:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose Mmm. Oh, uh ... yeah. It's really not FP quality, just a standard snapshot-esque photo. ¢rassic ! (talk) 16:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose per the points mentioned by Coneslayer, Diliff and Crassic. —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 20:37, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

. --John254 18:44, 5 July 2008 (UTC)