Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/LCD Pixels 2

LCD Pixels (Public domain version of previous featured picture)



 * Nominate. - Noclip 23:28, 26 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment What is the source of the original image? NASA? Whatever the source the status of the original image needs to be cleared up on the image page. HighInBC 23:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Support It's a good look at how LCD pixels operate -- R'son-W (speak to me/breathe) 00:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak oppose. Mostly because the original image is grainy. Since just about any image could be used as the original in a remake of this picture, I think one of those (such as a current FP) should be used instead. I will support a version with a better original image, but for now, I don't think this is FP material. -- Tewy  03:34, 27 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Oppose, it's a poor choice of image for this example, because the large amount of action in the background is distracting from the small piece that depicts what's actually being shown Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 04:01, 27 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Oppose. Image:Liquid Crystal Display Macro Example zoom.jpg illustrates the subject much better. Dr Zak 04:17, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * That one was stripped of featured status because it isn't fully free--it contains the copyrighted wikipedia logo. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 06:32, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Unless a picture displays the details that that picture shows it can't be featured. Dr Zak 21:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Oppose You cannot see the pixels here, only colored stripes. You really need an authentic micro image of the pixels, showing the small "dots" of transistors, too. There are black lines between the pixels in an actual display, missing here. --Janke | Talk 05:30, 27 August 2006 (UTC)


 * oppose. Get it more like the previously featured picture, without much action or anything else distracting, just without anything that may have bee copy righted. Then properly display the pixels and it will be near perfect. say1988 02:13, 28 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Oppose. At first glance I thought it was a poorly cropped image of a shuttle. Then I noticed a oddly looking "building" behind the shuttle. Only after reading the title I realized that it is about LCD. One should immediately understand the context of the image (at least vaguely) when seeing it, without the need of zooming.--JyriL talk 22:02, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Oppose. Too busy. The concept is sound, but this choice of base image is inappropriate. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 21:07, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Raven4x4x 06:39, 5 September 2006 (UTC)