Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Large Gautama Buddha statue in Buddha Park of Ravangla, Sikkim

Large Gautama Buddha statue in Buddha Park of Ravangla, Sikkim
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2018  at 14:44:07 (UTC)

 Original – Large Gautama Buddha statue in Buddha Park of Ravangla, Sikkim
 * Reason:A high resolution image of this land mark Large Gautama Buddha statue in Ravangla, Sikkim
 * Articles in which this image appears:Buddha Park of Ravangla
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Artwork/Sculpture
 * Creator:Subhrajyoti


 * Support as nominator – Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 14:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Support Nice -- LivioAndronico (talk) 17:00, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Subhrajyoti07, i have upload a version with the colours correct if you need,bye-- LivioAndronico (talk) 09:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you LivioAndronico for your effort in improving the photo. I have taken the pointers here and added some additional changes and created the Edit 1 version. Pl share your views on the same. - Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 16:09, 5 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Support now, since brightness is fixed. The sky is still a bit ominous, though... --Janke | Talk 17:11, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Support - Saturation may be a tad high for an overcast day, but I think this is still a good representation of this statue. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:23, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose Colours do not seem natural. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:09, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * colours have been much improved, but the weather and technical quality, possibly limited by the camera's capabilities, are not FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:13, 8 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Oppose – agree with Chris and Charles. I would change my vote to Support if saturation, and perhaps even contrast, are reduced. (the clothing of visitors at the base of the statue are too colorful, not real) Bammesk (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose – Per previous two. Colors look over-manipulated to me. Saturation has been toned down but to me it still seems rather too pronounced. Sca (talk) 13:08, 5 June 2018 (UTC) – Sca (talk) 13:41, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Thanks for the feedback received till now. I have created a slightly different version of the original uploaded picture as Edit 1. In this version the saturation and the global contrast has been dialed down a bit in line with the feedback. Also the sky looks more natural. The new version has been uploaded along with a link to the original image (at the top). Pl share your views - Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 14:20, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Support – better now, I struck my oppose. At full size the bright boundary around earlobes is distracting, especially on left side, can it be improved? Bammesk (talk) 01:54, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Thanks for identifying. I have made some changes on the edges of both the ear lobes and some body part edges to rectify the issue. Pl check and let me know if the same has been resolved. - Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 02:44, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Bammesk (talk) 03:08, 6 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Requesting other reviewers of preceding FPCs to share your views as well:  - Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 02:35, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Do you have unedited raw original to compare? I see that the original has also been edited. Brandmeistertalk   08:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment -  - Straight out of camera,  Raw file converted without any adjustments/post processing applied to jpeg format as requested - Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 14:33, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Support Ok, although I'd prefer less harsh retouching. Brandmeistertalk  16:18, 8 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Support – Yann (talk) 10:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 20:29, 13 June 2018 (UTC)