Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Macaca nigra self-portrait

Macaca nigra self-portrait
Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2011 at 18:31:28 (UTC) right|260px|Original - Self-portrait of a female Celebes crested macaque (Macaca nigra) in North Sulawesi, Indonesia, who had picked up photographer David Slater's camera and photographed herself with it.
 * Reason:High technical quality, public domain (because a monkey cannot hold a copyright), verifiable (if the Daily Mail counts), and a very unique and interesting image: a self-portrait by a macaque, a type of old-world monkey, who picked up a photographer's camera. Also kinda cute.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Celebes crested macaque, Macaque
 * FP category for this image:WP:FP
 * Creator:a monkey


 * Support as nominator --dbw (talk) 18:31, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Support It's so cute and kind image about monkey. :) --Mehdi (talk) 19:04, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Are we sure about the copyright status? Last I heard the photographer was still arguing about it. JJ Harrison (talk) 23:49, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Does the law explicitly say person? Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:14, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Apparently so. J Milburn (talk) 10:49, 22 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Oppose, as I'm not convinced of the EV. If we had an article about animal self-portraits or something, then maybe, but this doesn't necessarily tell us much about the species. J Milburn (talk) 10:51, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose Too small resolution to be considered for FP.--Nanoman657 (talk) 15:05, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose Copyright issue aside, the image is much too small. Let it be noted that "A Monkey" is a very nice change to see in the creator field, and I would like to see more artworks by animals. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:17, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong support. The fact (if not a hoax) that an animal could create such a sharp (and yes, cute) image is astonishing. Surely it tells a lot about these critically endangered species - that they can photograph :-). Materialscientist (talk) 10:39, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose The image is very nice, but it's not particularly encyclopedic. What importance does the subject of the picture have? This would be much better suited as a candidate for Valued Images on Commons. -- Diego_pmc  Talk 19:45, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Looks like a valuable image to me.Trongphu (talk) 20:53, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 09:54, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Picture should be deleted. Its copyrighted!