Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Map of the Battle of Jutland, 1916 (2)

Map of the Battle of Jutland (2)
Voting period ends on 2 Feb 2013 at 17:21:25 (UTC)
 * Reason:A second nomination for the file. During and since the first I've taken on board some of the points that were raised (e.g. Wilhelmshaven; Cologne). I feel it's a strong file that was held back by be tested against being even better. Whilst I don't feel that's an unfair standard on SVGs, editable as they are, I think there comes a point where we've done what we can and depending on what you guys can come up with by way of criticism that point may have been reached.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Battle of Jutland and a dozen others about individual ships that took part in the battle.
 * FP category for this image:Maps and Diagrams
 * Creator:Grandiose based on a US military source and supplementary information from OpenStreetMap


 * Support as nominator -- Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 17:21, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Support as before. It improved a lot during the first nom. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:58, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Support This is an excellent map which fully meets the FP criteria. Nick-D (talk) 10:50, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but tiny, weak oppose . It is improved from the previous version, but its graphics is not really appealing with the 3x repetition of "Battle of Jutland", 2x the north sign, the distracting four legend/title boxes each of different size, and the capital city of Oslo not labelled. Still find it confusing on a map of a 1916 battle, to see labels such as "1917" with the same font, and both combatants being green, but I understand this might be a question of personal taste, while veterans would be fine. Most of all, as a new reader, I don't find the map facilitating the understanding of the article. -- ELEKHHT 13:34, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I have updadted it to include Kristiania (with a note on the description mentioning that it was the name for what is now Oslo) and I have made the boxes in the side panels the same size, removed two instances of the "Battle of Jutland" header and shrunk the north arrows - tin my opinion they're important for continuity between the panels. I have added a note to the filedesc about military timings. (The image didn't seem to update, but I think it's a purging sort of a problem. If Kristiania isn't marked, then that is not the new version.) Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 18:09, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I think all those small simplifications make the map clearer, so I no longer oppose. -- ELEKHHT 21:13, 31 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Support, excellent map. —Ynhockey (Talk) 15:16, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Support I'm no expert on the Battle of Jutland but as a non-expert I think I get a reasonable idea of the ships' movements from this map. I see no glaring technical issues. There are a few things that I might tweak if this was my own map but I think this is good enough as it is. --Pine✉ 20:17, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 17:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC)