Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Marbled rock crab

Marbled rock crab (Pachygrapsus marmoratus)
Voting period ends on 27 May 2010 at 06:19:14 (UTC)
 * Reason:Good quality and resolution. EV: show running animal in wild. It is small and very fast crab.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Pachygrapsus marmoratus
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Animals/Others
 * Creator:George Chernilevsky


 * Support as nominator and creator -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Support I like the crab, but the algae in the picture makes it look kind of "icky". Haljackey (talk) 15:36, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It is natural background: a rock with algae in surf zone -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 18 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Conditional Support Please identify the algae in the caption.  upstate NYer  21:36, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * why do you need the alga? Abisharan (talk) 22:48, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Suspect doing so would actually be very difficult. Noodle snacks (talk) 22:54, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed, and I'm not really seeing why it is all that necessary. J Milburn (talk) 23:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't mean ID genus species, I just meant mention it: "Icky green stuff in background is in fact just regular sea algae" or something of the sort.  upstate NYer  22:30, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I have added the information about algae in the file description -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Not very engaging at thumbnail but good EV --Muhammad (talk)
 * Support but a slightly oblique angle would have probably looked better and shown a bit more. Noodle snacks (talk) 09:20, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'll be honest, I think I prefer this one- the lighting's a little better, the focus is a tad better and the background is a little more compelling. J Milburn (talk) 15:40, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * :) This one is my work too (My first FP on Commons). Taken with old 5Mp compact camera. Happy shot, but slightly overexplosed IMO. -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's the only thing I thought as a possible problem- I'm not sure it detracts from the image much. I'd be happy to full support that one, I'm neutral on this one. J Milburn (talk) 22:09, 19 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Good quality. Slightly out of focus on the very edge of some of the appendages, but too slight to really detract. I would consider the 'icky' moss a positive thing :)  Jujutacular  T · C 04:34, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 08:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC)