Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Maureen O'Hara

Maureen O'Hara
Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2012 at 06:13:44 (UTC)


 * Reason:Really fine photo of a Hollywood star
 * Articles in which this image appears:Maureen O'Hara
 * FP category for this image:People/Entertainment
 * Creator:Unknown (studio publicity still)


 * Support as nominator --—Eustress talk 06:13, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Tomer T (talk) 08:18, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Too much airbrushing/photoshopping, or probably a combination. Her skin looks plastic, with her forehead in particular lacking any detail. The blacks are too heavy, again completely lacking any detail, and/or significantly artifacted (shadowy parts of hair at top and right side of her head, and even worse is her neck). And what on earth has happened to her right eye? That alone would disqualify it. --jjron (talk) 13:36, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Yes, the whites are slightly washed out, but the flatness of the skin is likely largely due to this being a promotional shot. Per historical value, this is as high quality as you're going to get. Staxringold talkcontribs 18:40, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Jjron, over-manipulated, and is not as if she hasn't been much photographed. -- ELEKHHT 05:50, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose per jjron. Thought it looked not quite natural, but couldn't put my finger on why. JJ did. Clegs (talk) 11:50, 8 March 2012 (UTC)


 * --Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:04, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Three and three. Not promoted. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:04, 16 March 2012 (UTC)