Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Military working dog

Military working dog

 * Reason:Good quality image showing working dog and relation with human.
 * Articles this image appears in:Dog, War dog
 * Creator:Flickr


 * Support as nominator  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 12:11, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * oppose - as an illustration of a dog per se, this is lacking - the dog is unsharp and not being a "standard" dog. Maybe if the article found a home in a more appropriate article - like "Military Canines" or something like that. de Bivort 17:32, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment It is not an illustration of a dog, the image is showing the relationship between dog and human.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 17:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, the reason I said that is that you only included "dog" as the article illustrated by the image in the original nom. Glad to see it is used more specifically.
 * weak oppose there are the same technical issues, and really, I would like to see the dog in its military capacity if possible, rather than waiting around. de Bivort 20:42, 16 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Support per nom. Mario  1987  17:50, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Clegs (talk) 19:01, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 23:00, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose - low technical quality, and the subject is not that unique or portrayed in a unique way.--Svetovid (talk) 10:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment What do you mean by "the subject is not that unique or portrayed in a unique way"?  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 10:52, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not a historic photo and a relatively easy to reproduce scene.--Svetovid (talk) 23:00, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose poor quality at full resolution. -- Grandpafootsoldier (talk) 20:42, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Serious compression artifacts at full resolution. No wow factor. Kaldari (talk) 22:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose The coloring isn't great, and at full size, it is slightly blurry and grainy. Juliancolton (Talk) 14:33, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Juliancolton, Kaldari. Cacophony (talk) 05:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|15px|top]] Oppose – Secondary subject cut off, poor quality at high resolution.  Centy  – [ reply ]• contribs  – 20:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

MER-C 07:32, 24 February 2008 (UTC)