Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Mt hotham alpine range scenery.jpg

Great Dividing Range
Another from the Alpine Country of Victoria. Great "top of the world" kind of feeling. Illustrates the article much better than either of the other two images IMO.
 * Support Self Nom. --Fir0002 style="color:#C6CACC; background:#F8FCFF">www 12:27, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Happy to give the first support vote to what will surely be another Fir0002 FP. Staxringold 14:15, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. ed g2s &bull; talk 14:30, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Hard to criticize. bcasterline t 16:58, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support (original). Comments unnecessary. --Janke | Talk 20:26, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support superb ~ Veledan • Talk 21:12, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Excellent.-- Dakota ~ 07:01, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support -- Chris 73 | Talk 07:46, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support breathtaking. Pegasus1138 Talk 09:30, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support both illustrative and beautiful. Mikeo 09:39, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Excellent photgraph and yes, breathtaking to the user above. -- Thorpe | talk 14:38, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Stunning sky, I like how the top lighting makes the clouds contrast with the blue. So support from me, even it it means that 0.7% of all FPs will be of Mt. Hotham. Someone should buy you an around-the-world ticket. I feel your skills could be put to even more use for WP. . --Dschwen 19:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The different between the versions is subtle. But my support goes according to the photographer. I'll trust his recount of the color and contrast. --Dschwen 17:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support--Joe Jklin 22:11, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.png|15px|Support]] Support as uploader of second copy.  J.Steinbock  (Talk)
 * What is the difference? chowells 17:08, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Appears to be a small color correction; the original is a bit on the cyan side, but the edit is magenta. Prefer original. --Janke | Talk 06:09, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support not bad. chowells 17:08, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I've uploaded an edit, but on my monitor I think the original was the best. --Fir0002 style="color:#C6CACC; background:#F8FCFF">www 11:02, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Agree - there's even more cyan in your edit, so I still prefer the original. --Janke | Talk 06:15, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't quite get the import export thing? Without using the propper ICM color profiles (which would require you to use RAW and import with a Canon EOS 20D profile) this is basicly just alchemy, isn't it? --Dschwen 07:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

per Fir's wishes and general concensus for original version ~ Veledan • Talk 21:38, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support original. The edits make the colors look unreal. There was no need for artificial color enhancement to begin with. - Mgm|(talk) 08:42, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Beautiful Sky. Tobb 23:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Prefer original, really nice. |→ Spaully°τ 10:42, 27 April 2006 (GMT)
 * Support original --T-rex 02:14, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support original Great image, feels like im on top of the world -- BWF89 01:06, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Support --Nrainer 14:05, 29 April 2006 (UTC)