Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Munttoren

Munttoren

 * Reason:EV+Quality
 * Articles this image appears in:Munttoren, Muntplein and Hendrick de Keyser
 * Creator:Massimo Catarinella


 * Support as nominator --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 13:07, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Info There are five locations to take a picture of this tower from. Since the square itself is a major crossing point of public transport (tram numbers 4, 9, 14, 16, 24 and 25), overhead cables block the view of the tower from three of those locations (Vijzelstraat, Reguliersbreestraat and Muntplein). The two other location which remain, are the Koningsplein and the bridge across the Amstel I used. If I would have taken this picture from the Koningsplein, the lower half of the tower would have been obscured (see the historic picture in the Munttoren article). So, only the location I used was suitable. One thing I also would like to point out, is that there was no wind at the time (a storm had just passed by). This is something very special here, since there may be only a couple of windless days a year. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 13:21, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Good reflections in water, seems cropped a little high though.  Durova  284 16:20, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's cropped a little bit high, but I did it on purpose. Aesthetically I think the picture looks better this way. Further more the tower isn't that high and so it appears less high in the picture through this crop. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 16:37, 25 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Support per nom. It's a shame about the flagpole sticking up at the left of the tower, but since that's the only suitable location there doesn't seem to have been much you could have done about that.  Time3000 (talk) 09:10, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * That's not a flag pole, but just an ordinary pole, to which they attach the overhead cables used by trams for power. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 11:06, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Good point. Trams are all but non-existent in the UK so I automatically though 'flagpole' for something that shape ; ).  Time3000 (talk) 13:00, 26 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Support. Seems a bit too dark though. I'm sure this was by choice too, but you could have brought out a little bit more detail if it were lighter. There is no rule for this sort of night photography though, as the idea of matching what our eyes see breaks down in the dark, and it becomes a matter of personal choice on the basis of aesthetics. When EV is an important factor though, I think brighter = better. Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 11:17, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I've uploaded a version with an increased amount of brightness. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 11:42, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * A subtle difference. I might have increased it a little more still, but clearly good enough. :-) Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs)


 * Support + Comment – It might just be me, but the tower seems like it is a bit more on the left side of the image, and there is slightly more space on the right side. Do you think it would be good to crop it to center the tower? NW ( Talk ) 16:19, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I think the composition would be better, if it stays the way it is. You're right that the tower is slightly located left of centre. In my opinion this improves the composition as supposed to it being located in the centre. However, if more people feel it should be located in the centre of the image, I would be more then happy to upload a different crop. I'll fly off tomorrow to Portugal for two weeks, so if a consensus of support is reached for the different crop, I'll upload it over the current version once I return. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 18:09, 26 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Oppose There is some wierd blurring on the right hand side near the building above the wires suspending the lights. The edge of a building on the right hurts the composition in my view. I feel that it has been taken a bit too late (deep shadows), and that it is underexposed. Noodle snacks (talk) 01:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Promoted -- Sedd&sigma;n talk|WikimediaUK 01:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC)