Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Muskox

Muskox
Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2023  at 00:13:10 (UTC)
 * Reason:High quality large image. A very similar image is FP on Commons, but this has higher EV.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Muskox
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
 * Creator:Charlesjsharp


 * Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 00:13, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Support Good enough focus is beheld on most parts of the visible subject's body / wool / qiviut. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 11:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Neutral due to artifacting in background - haven't seen this before. It's visible on the file description page. MER-C 16:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree. I suspect the bokeh on the camera didn't play nice with the branches in the background, but I haven't seen that issue often with Canon. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:08, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Very curious bokeh, something I wouldn't expect from a $2500 RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM lens... A second-rate or damaged filter, perchance? (Edit: some samples here: ) --Janke | Talk 15:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 04:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)