Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Myrtle Warbler

Myrtle Warbler
Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2012 at 18:43:25 (UTC)
 * Reason:Good EV, composition and quality. FP in commons.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Myrtle Warbler
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
 * Creator:Cephas

What exactly is this nom waiting for? As far as I can see, it has the requisite support regardless of what 'timid' means. Looks like a promotion to me. &#208;iliff   &#171;&#187;  (Talk)  05:51, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 18:43, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Support – Great resolution. I have no complains. Plus, this picture is already a FP in Commons. ComputerJA (talk) 01:32, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Jkadavoor (talk) 13:43, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose definitely blurry around the bird's chest area. Pine✉ 05:24, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Support Could benefit from fill flash, and stopping down a bit. JJ Harrison (talk) 05:35, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Support. And some sharpening. &#208;iliff    &#171;&#187;  (Talk)  12:37, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Timid Support Could be a bit clearer, but has some potential. Oakley77 (talk) 02:41, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Timid = weak?? Makeemlighter (talk) 00:34, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't understand that as weak. For a support to be 'weak', it should be stated clearly. If he didn't say 'weak', it shouldn't be regarded as such. If it was 'weak', I would have add this nomination to FPC urgents. Tomer T (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Read with the comment ("...has some potential") it sounds like a 'weak'. But maybe Oakley needs to confirm. --jjron (talk) 14:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * If it's considered 'weak', I don't think it's a fair procedure. Tomer T (talk) 14:53, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Only 4.5 if timid means weak. I asked the user to clarify a while back and got a response from another user that I didn't know what to do with. See User_talk:Oakley77. Makeemlighter (talk) 20:26, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I guess you interpret the voting system a little differently to me. I could be wrong in my interpretation but I thought the closer was supposed to count the total number of support votes (whether weak or full) needed to be 5 or more, then analyse support-to-oppose ratio (taking into account weaks here only) to see if there is a two-thirds majority to pass. Since there are six supports and a two third majority, I thought it was a simple pass. But I see your point if you count weak supports as 0.5 votes towards the minimum support votes required. &#208;iliff    &#171;&#187;  (Talk)  08:33, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Support excellent photo Azylber (talk) 07:09, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry Azylber, as per above, voting ended on the 12th of June... &#208;iliff    &#171;&#187;  (Talk)  08:33, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Diliff, sorry, I hadn't realised. My mistake Azylber (talk) 15:36, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

--Julia\talk 15:53, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Has been renominated. Featured picture candidates/Myrtle Warbler 2 Julia\talk  15:53, 21 July 2012 (UTC)