Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Neptunbrunnen

Neptunbrunnen
Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2016 at 11:56:36 (UTC)
 * Reason:Good quality and high EV for showing the fountain and its surrounding square. FP, VI and QI in Commons.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Neptunbrunnen
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Places/Urban
 * Creator:Ajepbah


 * Support as nominator – Tomer T (talk) 11:56, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose – Loose composition. Low EV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sca (talk • contribs) 15:20, 19 December 2015
 * Support nice. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Low EV for the fountain itself. If there were something on the square, maybe, but the fountain is barely discernible at thumbnail. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Support – Jobas (talk) 18:01, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Support Looks good to me - the high of the camera position isn't ideal but everything is clear, and fountain is centre and in just about enough detail. What do you mean by "Loose Composition" Sca? I don't understand your terminology. The fountain is dead centre, exactly the same amount of each green triangles showing, the horiozontal and vertical lines of the lighter paving is plum...  gaz hiley  10:43, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Too much space around central edifice. (Per Chris). – Sca (talk) 14:54, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * But the Nom is for the "fountain and its surrounding square", which increases the EV by showing the setting it is in... gaz hiley  16:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Empty space usually is boring. True, there are people in it, but from this vantage point they are too small to be interesting. Aesthetically and in terms of EV, it's a substandard composition, IMO. Sca (talk) 22:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The article itself is on the fountain, so the empty space limits the EV. If the article had discussion of the square, it might be different. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:09, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * For example, take a look at this photo of another Neptune fountain, this one in Gdańsk. – Sca (talk) 22:37, 22 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Oppose per Crisco, it doesn't show the fountain clearly, and the article is about the fountain and not the square. Mattximus (talk) 23:41, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose – I haven't been to this fountain but I have seen similar fountains in person. This is not a good image of the fountain (the angle of view diminishes height). Bammesk (talk) 03:40, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Support per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:19, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Support per my !vote at Commons. Daniel Case (talk) 07:19, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose. Love the composition, but I agree about the lack of EV. Josh Milburn (talk) 02:27, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 15:06, 1 January 2016 (UTC)