Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Night view of Clinton Library

Night view of the Clinton Presidential Library

 * Reason:Quality image with a lot of color and detail.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Clinton Presidential Center
 * Creator:Archipreneur


 * Support as nominator --  fetch  comms  ☛ 04:30, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose Lovely picture but seems out of focus to me - Very low resolution as well as cannot zoom in to check in close up - even at full resolution view you cannot see much detail. Shame, as its an intruiging building and I'm now going to read the article, which is always a good thing with an FP... Gazhiley (talk) 11:09, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Nice subject and view of it, but poor HDR (haloes) and needs perspective correction. &#208;iliff    &#171;&#187;  (Talk)  12:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose per &#208;iliff. Kaldari (talk) 20:08, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose- I'm not wild about the colours and lighting on this one. J Milburn (talk) 21:17, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment It's quite an attractive image, and has very good composition. It provides information about the context of the building, not only the building itself. I think it has very good EV in the article it mainly illustrates. I added it to Polshek Partnership as well. Unfortunate is technically not perfect, as per Diliff. As always, the panoramic format makes it somewhat hard to optimally fit in articles. Elekhh (talk) 23:48, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks all for your comments, it seems rather unlikely that this will pass, but I think that I have a good idea of what work needs to be done now. As I'm not really that good with technical things in images, I'd appreciate any more comments before this is closed.  fetch  comms  ☛ 03:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * My main complaint is the overdone HDR. If you're going to create HDR images, you should be careful that they do not exhibit "haloing" or other obvious artifacts. In this case you can see strong haloing around the trees. Kaldari (talk) 17:39, 28 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose. Per above. But otherwise good photo.  -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 23:55, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment There is at least one stitching error going down the center. It's most obvious at the roof railing level.  upstate NYer  01:48, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 01:57, 4 February 2010 (UTC)