Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Nuuk Panorama image

Nuuk Panorama Image

 * Reason:Very detailed, high-definition panorama
 * Articles this image appears in:Nuuk
 * Creator:Pcziko


 * Support as nominator --♪ Tempo Di  Valse ♪ 23:44, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose Periodic splodges from something on the top left corner of each frame, very visible stitching lines. Noodle snacks (talk) 00:29, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose In addition to stitching errors, sharpness and blown highlights are also concerns.  Spencer T♦C 01:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose Top of Mtn in center is cropped, piss poor stitching and bad exposure. FAIL. --75.69.60.172 (talk) 03:20, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * note - votes of anonymous IPs are 'generally disregarded' (as probably those of anyone using the term 'FAIL') please login to vote. Mfield (talk) 03:50, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Although to be honest, I'm glad someone who can't be hauled up for AGF used the phrase 'piss-poor' to describe the stitching. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 08:45, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Its probably the user's first nomination. Give the guy a break. Muhammad (talk) 16:02, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose Its a nice location, so its a shame about the technical problems. The stitching errors could probably be fixed but the clipped mountains at top are a problem and the exposure is off. It would be worth reshooting. Mfield (talk) 03:50, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose It's a pity that this is a disaster in several technical aspects (the stitching, most notably) because I think it could have made for a fascinating and beautiful photograph. -- mcshadypl T C  07:10, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose - awful stitching, cut off mountains, visual defect top left of every frame, overexposed, blown highlights, heavy JPG compression. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 08:45, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose Unfortunate stitching problems ruin the image. Exposure is off as well. Elucidate (parlez à moi) Ici pour humor 13:49, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment No need to pile on opposes, this image has top enc but fails terribly in other aspects. Would definitely support a similar panorama without the tech problems. --Janke | Talk 16:59, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Interesting picture with possibility to be enhanced by a little bit of editing. --Caspian blue 23:18, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Unfortunately the stitching, the difference in WB among the separate shots and the dirty spot on the top left of each shot spoil this panorama. Luca (talk) 17:11, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I agree that this has potential to be improved with some editing, although some problems like the cropped mountain are incapable of being fixed. Dar-Ape 22:09, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Not necessarily. Note the position of the blotch in the the mountain frames - I'd guess the whole mountain is ion the original frames. Has anybody contacted the photographer - we could get one of our "panogurus" to re-stich and de-blob this from the originals. As a subject, it's definitely FP worthy... --Janke | Talk 08:36, 27 October 2008 (UTC) PS: I see Mfield contacted - any luck?
 * A reply is unlikely; The user's last contribution was in January. Noodle snacks (talk) 08:48, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * No reply. If iI get an answer then I'll restitch it and fix all the issues. Until then though we're out of luck. Mfield (talk) 15:28, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

MER-C 11:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)