Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/P-51 Mustang

P-51 Mustang


Very clear and bright picture of a classic WWII figter, shot from a rare head-on in flight;


 * Nominate and support. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 18:40, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll amend that to now support edit 1. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 04:43, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Great picture.--Mike [[Image:Flag of the United States.svg|25px]] 18:46, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose I hate to do this to my favorite aircraft of all time, but it's a bit grainy, there are jpg artifacts in the sky, and the wings' leading edges are all blown highlights. --Bridgecross 19:08, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * "Still oppose all edits!" he cried weakly from the bottom of the pile :) --Bridgecross 16:38, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I wouldn't like to discard this remarkable picture too quickly. I don't care for the highlights but there are "finger-type" stains all over the image which don't look like jpeg artifacts. Alvesgaspar 19:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thats dust on the digital sensor. A common but rather annoying problem. Could easily be cloned out but the only real solution is cleaning the sensor! Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 19:42, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Support because of the grain. Not a bad picture overall, and I don't mind the blown highlights (it might even be the sun's reflection). Perhaps Fir could fix it. | A ndonic O Talk 21:40, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose . More likely, they're water spots on the canopy of the plane that the photographer is in (you can see part of the canopy in the lower left corner). But it's a very nice capture otherwise.  howch e  ng   {chat} 21:41, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1.  howch e  ng   {chat} 07:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support Either edit. Amazing angle --Fir0002 23:08, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Did you seriously clone out hundreds of blotches?! That gets you an effort-support edit (the perferably the lightened one). --Dschwen 23:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Edit 1. Good detail, distinctive colours, exciting angle - the plane really looks like a proper fighter in a photograph like this. Bob talk 01:11, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support: A good picture and a great background. 01:12, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support I like this picture, so I will not shoot it down. TomStar81 (Talk) 03:36, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Very nice!!  --Midnight Rider 04:34, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1 &mdash; Great photo, great edits by Fir. I oppose edit 2 though, as it seems to have turned out little too bright. ♠ SG →Talk 08:27, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1. Alvesgaspar 09:20, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Edit 1. I love the angle, and the edits fix most of the quality issues. Edit 2 is a little too bright, however. Nautica Shad e  s  10:20, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support either edit. I chaged my vote. It's just about perfect now. | A ndonic O Talk 13:27, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support either edit, though I think I slightly prefer edit 2. Great image of the greatest fighter plane ever. :-) « amiИa . skyшalkeя (¿Hábleme?)  15:08, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1 - Mgm|(talk) 12:55, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Either edit! A great shot. Jellocube27 17:48, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1 Edit 2 seems a little too light, so I'm sticking with edit 1.  Jumping cheese  [[Image:Misc-tpvgames.gif|18px]] Cont @  ct 23:12, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1 per above -- antilived T 04:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Support edit 1 near perfect with the edits.
 * Support edit 1, fantastic pic! - Mailer Diablo 19:20, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Edits 1 and 2 both work for me. ~ trialsanderrors 00:19, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1 only. Edit 2 is too light for me. Good shot. -- Tewy  04:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Raven4x4x 08:02, 30 November 2006 (UTC)