Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Paper fortune teller

Paper fortune teller diagram
Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2013 at 12:19:17 (UTC)
 * Reason:High quality, easy to follow diagram which is useful for its subject
 * Articles in which this image appears:Paper fortune teller
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Diagrams
 * Creator:MichaelPhilip


 * Support as nominator -- — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:19, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. The deficiency I see with this illustration is that it does not show where the numbers and/or fortunes are written. 86.179.115.136 (talk) 13:58, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Good point (and I forget how to do it myself). Will try to find something for SVGs, but I'm terrible at that. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:31, 18 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Question: How is WP:NOTHOWTO applied to images, if at all? -- WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  14:06, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * See it as "how something is made" and not "how to make something". We've got featured pictures of a uranium extraction process, after all. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:31, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * We do? The only Uranium FP we have that I'm aware of is File:HEUraniumC.jpg which is a billet of highly enriched uranium... nothing to do with extraction (Crushing, then creating Uranium hexafluoride) nor does it have to do with the enriching process. Theres also a fundamental difference if we did have a FP quality picture of any of these industrial processes, it it wouldn't exactly be a guide. This is pretty much a guide, so I dunno. — raeky  t  16:39, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * This set, though admittedly not as detailed as the one here. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:51, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Out of curiosity, is the image being nominated fundamentally different than, say, File:Regular Dodecagon Inscribed in a Circle.gif, which shows "how to" construct a dodecagon?


 * Weak support - Agree that adding the numbers would be informative. Chris857 (talk) 00:01, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Not really effective as a set of instructions, and some of the diagrams (#8, for example) are particuarly unclear.  An animation would be far more effective.  Spikebrennan (talk) 21:05, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose I was ready to support this up until the last 2 pictures. The transition between them is not shown clearly at all, and that's probably the most complex part of this process.-- mcshadypl T C  14:15, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 14:29, 27 July 2013 (UTC)