Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Perimeter

Perimeter


I nominate this image because it is particularly striking and draws attention immediately, as well as because it illustrates the reality of Perimeter in a way words cannot possibly. Picture was taken by Tim Horton.


 * Nominate and support. - Tim Horton 03:38, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The blown highlights in the sky and elsewhere are the main problems, along with the picture being fairly blurry/grainy. The angle is good, but the technical aspects of the picture ruin it as a FP. -- Tewy  03:43, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Tim, I think that the other image in the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics article is more qualified for FPC than this image. If you would like to nominate a picture of this building, I would suggest the version that was taken from the front and has a better saturation of colors, has less grain, etc.. -- Tewy  03:52, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * OpposeBlurred - Adrian Pingstone 07:53, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose per poor technical quality. HighInBC 16:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Blurry and grainy. Angle is OK, position is not. 207.87.51.122 01:16, 19 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Oppose - poorly focused. --Ineffable3000 02:13, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Boring.  That pretty much sums it up.  --Midnight Rider 04:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose I actually agree with Tewy, the other image in the article is much nicer (though I think the trees may keep it from passing FPC). Staxringold talkcontribs 15:31, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Raven4x4x 04:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC)