Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Phalacrocorax-auritus-007.jpg

Phalacrocorax-auritus-007.jpg
A very good picture by Mdf of a Double-crested cormorant in a typical pose, drying its wings. Used in Double-crested Cormorant and List of Oklahoma birds (a featured list). 12/1 -- 9 votes for orginal version, 2 votes for edited version, 1 vote for either version, 1 vote opposed -- Jtkiefer  T - 06:09, August 29, 2005 (UTC) 
 * Nominate and support. Dsmdgold 04:10, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * My support is for the original. Dsmdgold 10:32, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support -- Technically excellent. &mdash; Xiong &#29066; talk * 07:38, 2005 August 18 (UTC)
 * Support--Looks good -- ZeWrestler  Talk 11:58, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Edited version --Fir0002 12:21, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support, edited version is much brighter and more appealing. Phoenix2 02:14, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support original - A great illustration for the topic. Again, Fir0002, the enhanced version is more striking, but it now looks unnatural, and the background has become too prominent. Perhaps somewhere between the two images would be better. (Donovan|Geocachernemesis|Interact) 03:08, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Support the original image. 144.137.244.4 07:47, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Support original.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91  ($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|)  16:38, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Support either version. Sango  123  16:52, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support original. Enochlau 06:20, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Support original.— Encephalon |  &zeta;   05:03:48, 2005-08-22 (UTC)
 * Support original. While I don't immediately think "unnatural", the colours our reminiscent of 1960s Kodachrome technique. --  user:zanimum
 * Oppose. I dont eally know what to say, it just doesnt grab my eye at all. Maybe a front shot I would appreciate more. --ScottyBoy900Q ∞  14:29, 25 August 2005 (UTC)