Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Phidippus audax male

Phidippus audax male
Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2012 at 20:58:36 (UTC)
 * Reason:High quality photo.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Phidippus audax, arthropod eye
 * FP category for this image:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arachnids
 * Creator:Opoterser


 * Support as nominator --Ciaran Sinclair (talk) 20:58, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Support I love phidippus, and this image is high quality. Rhonalex (talk) 21:16, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Support -- An incredible shot! How did the spider get a green backdrop? One can see the reflection in what appear to be the spider's four eyes. Cmguy777 (talk) 22:59, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Support impressive photo of something that size, adequate EV. Pine✉ 07:19, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Very yes! Almost good enough resolution to read the text on the rim of the camera lens in the reflections of the eyes :D - Running On Brains (talk) 16:21, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, I have added this to the Arthropod eye article. Would appreciate if someone could check my caption to make sure it's accurate; I read the Phidippus audax article but I am unfamiliar with the species in general. - Running On Brains (talk) 16:28, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Does "Very yes!" mean Support? You should probably clarify for the closer. Dusty 777 16:57, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * *sigh* yes.... - Running On Brains (talk) 06:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Oppose Tiny size and easily reproducible with the right equipment. JJ Harrison (talk) 13:14, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Impressive. Excellent quality despite the rather small size, good EV. Dusty 777 16:57, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I like the image and, while the resolution is small, I don't have an issue with this. My problem is with the images EV. The current lead image far better shows the creature, this one just shows far too little. - Peripitus (Talk) 12:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * While I agree the EV is borderline for the species, I added the image to the arthropod eye article, where I believe it has much higher EV. Would you reconsider for this article? - Running On Brains (talk) 06:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 *  Weak oppose I agree with Peripitus.-- GoP T C N 14:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Support now-- GoP T C N 11:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)


 * 'Support This is what people expect to see as FP. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 11:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

--Julia\talk 21:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC)