Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Photographer in Calgary

Photographer in Calgary

 * Reason:It is well composed (in my opinion), illustrates the topic well, and is of adequate size and resolution.
 * Articles this image appears in:Photographer
 * Creator:Stromcarlson


 * Support as nominator Kakofonous (talk) 19:43, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. Excellent resolution, great focus, and highly illustrative of the topic. Dr. Extreme (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Well composed, but the gray tarp is really distracting. The FP for photographer ought to be really outstanding. -Matthew Cieplak (talk) (edits) 00:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose Over saturated background. Grey tarp detracts (whats the point of photographing an object you can only see 2/3rds of and is covered by another object that is nondescript?). --Mike Spenard (talk) 03:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment It isn't a bad picture, but there's just nothing special about it; zero 'wow-factor.' faithless   (speak)  08:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Mike Spenard. Cacophony (talk) 08:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Mike Spenard Mfield (talk) 12:02, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose Not to sound like a broken record, but I'm jumping on the Mike bandwagon. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 20:56, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose per faithless. —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 22:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose per faithless. It's a guy taking a picture. Purple Is Pretty (talk) 00:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Opposethe backround is not good. the lens is the only good thing to see in this photo --Ulughmuztagh (talk) 17:43, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

. --John254 02:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)