Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Plasmaball vid1

Plasma Ball Vid1

 * Reason:Self nom but I feal it is a good video that shows the movement aspect of a plasma ball better than an image could. It is nominated here because featured videos (unlike featured sounds) dosen't appear to have got off the ground.
 * Articles this image appears in:Plasma_lamp
 * Creator:Myself user:geni


 * Support as nominator Geni 21:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Ridiculously blurry- filesize is not a limitation here, this is wikipedia. Anyway we could have a razor-sharp barely compressed video this size and only be a bit larger than some other FPs. Also, the entire audio track should be cut out with an OGG splitter D\=< (talk) 03:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose Froth's concerns having been aired, I'd love to see a bit more hi-def version and would absolutely support it.  Sing  Cal  16:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * currently haveing camera issues bot once sorted yes I can give it a go.Geni 02:43, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Conditional Support if the video is reshot - I successfully nominated the still version of this years ago, I'd be interested to seen the video one too. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 11:21, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


 * That being the case could this be withdrawn for the time being (not quite sure how that works here).Geni 18:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Okey I've reshot. I can't get the resultion any higher without loseing FPS.Geni 22:39, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

This seems to have fallen off the nomination pile. Relisting it. MER-C 05:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment - Do these things make noise, or is that just background noise in the original? Shoemaker&#39;s Holiday (talk) 06:38, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * They make a quiet hum, but only if you put your ear right up against them. For the purposes of the video, cutting out the sound channel completely and having it totally silent is the best way to go (does it actually have no sound channel or is it just a silent one? Removing the channel would shrink the file a little). We should add on the description page though, "This video intentionally has no sound" so people don't think their soundcard's bust or something. And for the second one, maybe emphasise that the video is not sped up in any way - someone could assume it was from the fast motion. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 12:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Support - now it's reshot, the quality and size are fine, the soundtrack (in fact, lack of it) is appropriate and it's educational. Well done. As per Creation and usage of media files it might be a good idea to make a smaller version (just scale to 25% of the size with an appropriate bitrate) for thumbnailing. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 12:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support per Vanderdecken. Concerns are assuaged. Shoemaker&#39;s Holiday (talk) 16:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support per Vanderdecken and Shoemaker. Durova Charge! 16:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

MER-C 07:21, 5 March 2009 (UTC)