Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Plover Chick

Plover Chick

 * Articles in which this image appears:Masked Lapwing
 * Creator:Benjamint 06:42, 1 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Support as nominator --Benjamint 06:42, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Not a hard photo to take, apart of course from getting the crap swooped out of you. Noodle snacks (talk) 11:22, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Is it a new trend to not provide a reason? --Elekhh (talk) 23:46, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - how did the link document lack of reasoning? if u support u obviously think it meets the requirements, comments go on top of that --  Chil dzy  ¤  Ta lk  10:44, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Elekh is talking about the template not being filled in completely, and in this case, the "Reason" field being removed entirely. I have to admit that I've often found it difficult to say more than "meets the criteria". Perhaps the rationale is that if you haven't considered the criteria by that point, you might at least stumble and go back to check them. We seem to get the occasional ineligible image nominated in spite of this. Maybe there should be a size criterion banner at the top of the FPC page. Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 20:40, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - good, interesting high EV photo meets the requirements --  Chil dzy  ¤  Ta lk  10:44, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak suppose I much prefer the previous effort - the higher resolution allows to see the down feathers clearly, whereas in this image, they're anything but clear. Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 20:40, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Suppose? I'm guessing this means you're neutral... Makeemlighter (talk) 01:07, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Correct. Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 17:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * SupportVery cute.--Mbz1 (talk) 03:10, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 05:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Ten days and only 4 supports. Makeemlighter (talk) 05:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)