Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Point Pelee marsh boardwalk

Point Pelee marsh boardwalk


This is a bold, striking panorama. I can't find any stitching artifacts and the image acts as an excellent representation of marsh lands; appears in wetland, marsh and boardwalk.

By


 * Nominate and support. - La  ï  ka  21:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose, lacking in detail. The grass just looks like noise. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 22:49, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Too much sky here. I want to see more of the marsh.  howch e  ng   {chat} 23:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose Pretty but needs more marsh SOADLuver 00:40, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I feel bad opposing as its *really* pretty much the fault of your camera. Like no joke.  I'm ditching my Olympus C-8080 (which actually gets alright pictures) but I'm interested in something that can capture ridiculous amounts of detail.  Also.. why isn't this image in Point Pelle National Park?  Well, I added it, so it is now..  drumguy8800   C   T  03:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Horizon is bent, and the resolution is too low. Yes, too low, 500px in height makes it hard to see any details. --Dschwen 09:56, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Great panorama, size is fine for me. --- Chris 73 | Talk 17:46, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Bad lighting, lack of detail, and as Dschwen said, the horizon is bent. -- Tewy  23:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose the composition is a little poor, the subject isn't that clear, and the vertical resolution is a bit low.--Andrew c 00:38, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

--KFP (talk | contribs) 00:33, 2 November 2006 (UTC)