Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Polar Map of Jupiter

Polar Map of Jupiter
[[Image:Map of Jupiter.jpg|thumb|200px|This map of Jupiter is the most detailed global color map of the planet ever produced. The round map is a polar stereographic projection that shows the south pole in the center of the map and the equator at the edge. It was constructed from images taken by Cassini on Dec. 11 and 12, 2000, as the spacecraft neared Jupiter during a flyby on its way to Saturn.

ReaganThe map shows a variety of colorful cloud features, including parallel reddish-brown and white bands, the Great Red Spot, multi-lobed chaotic regions, white ovals and many small vortices. Many clouds appear in streaks and waves due to continual stretching and folding by Jupiter's winds and turbulence. The bluish-gray features along the north edge of the central bright band are equatorial "hot spots," meteorological systems such as the one entered by NASA's Galileo probe. Small bright spots within the orange band north of the equator are lightning-bearing thunderstorms. The polar region shown here is less clearly visible because Cassini viewed it at an angle and through thicker atmospheric haze.]]
 * Reason:I am re-nominating this picture because it is the most detailed map of Jupiter ever produced, it was "Image of the Day" at the NASA website, and it has an exellent caption.
 * Articles this image appears in:Jupiter
 * Creator:NASA
 * Nominator: A ndonic O  Talk


 * Nominate and Support | A ndonic O  Talk 12:25, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment So why did you remove the FPC tag? Terri G 14:38, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. You already nominated this pic two and a half months ago. Whats the reason for renominating it so quickly? --Dschwen 14:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Oops! I had forgotten to remove the fpc tag the last time, and I hadn't decided to re-nominate it again when I removed it. As for why renominate it 2 1/2 months later, is it too early? I thought I had waited enough, but remove you can the nomination if it's too early. It should say somewhere how long we should wait though. | A ndonic O  Talk 15:03, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Question - There is something unnatural right on the pole. I remember someone asking the same question the last time but I forgot the answer... Are you sure it is the polar stereographic projection (because last time it was the orthographic and I don't see any good reason for that choice, an equal area projection might be better)? Alvesgaspar 16:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * (after edit conflict) The probe came in at an angle, and didn't pass directly under the pole, meaning it didn't have a picture of the very bottom. Instead of leaving a hole, they covered it up with a similar color. | A ndonic O  Talk 16:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support. Interesting way of looking at the different bands on Jupiter. If they had an animated version, showing the alternating rotation of each band, I would move for Speedy Promote :) &mdash; BRIAN 0918 &bull; 2007-01-05 21:17Z
 * That would actually be awesome, but as this is map composed from many satellite pictures I guess the chances are low such an animation will be possible. --Dschwen 10:00, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak support - I can get over the grey spot, but the edges of the planet seem overly sharpened, as if someone circularly cropped it. I would expect with a gas giant that the edges would be fuzzy, a bit like [[Image:Jupiter, Earth size comparison.jpg|25px|fuzzy jupiter]] this one, but I have reservations even on that - Jack (talk) 22:07, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This isn't a direct snapshot, it's a composite generated from many different pictures. That would explain the sharp edges and the grey area at the pole (that they didn't have any pictures of). Redquark 06:04, 6 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Support A kind of long descrition but an excellent map of an interesting planet. 00:06, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support. High quality, and I like the fact that it's an unconventional view of Jupiter -- it startles me into looking at it in a new way.  I think the image should be renamed "Map of Jupiter's south.jpg" though, since it doesn't show the northern hemisphere. Redquark 06:04, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose It is a very interesing picture that shows a fascinating view of Jupiter but I don´t think ist up to FPs standards. The circular grey spot in the middle ruins it for me. And it doesn´t have that crisp FP feeling to me. It is an awesome picture that benefits wikipedia greatly but it just doesnt fit FP standards. --Tobyw87 13:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Ironic isn't it? --⁪froth T  C  00:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Indeed, many pictures benefit wikipedia greatly but are not up to the standards of Featured Pictures .--Tobyw87 14:59, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Someone might be a little confused; the Cassini flyby produced the most detailed views of jupiter, but this specific shot is not the most detailed. See this one for example, much more detailed --⁪froth T C  00:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, the caption says it's the most detailed map. I agree the 3-d image is more aesthetically appealing though. | A ndonic O  Talk 01:02, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Raven4x4x 05:32, 13 January 2007 (UTC)