Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Porifera cell types 01.png

Porifera cell types 01.png
Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2011 at 16:55:01 (UTC)
 * Reason:Shows the cells of all sponges except for Glass sponges, which are shown further down at Sponge. At a size that is easy to see and, in an article, uses Template:Annotated image/Porifera cell types giving colour-code for easy identification of features.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Sponge
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Diagrams,_drawings,_and_maps/Diagrams
 * Creator:Philcha


 * Support as nominator --Philcha (talk) 16:55, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment This type of diagram works better as an SVG. Makeemlighter (talk) 16:25, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Got to agree with the above, and, of course, it's tiny. I'd want to see something significantly more impressive than this for FP status. J Milburn (talk) 10:03, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose. We had a biological diagram, File:Leaf Tissue Structure.svg, promoted recently and I think it demonstrates the standard we should be expecting here. This image seems cartoonish by comparison. I also agree that it should be an SVG. I do appreciate that a reference is given though.--RDBury (talk) 15:22, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * It's cartoonish to make it easy to see the cell types. It's sized to give all the information without minimal squeezing of the article's text. I don't know how to makes SVGs. Is there an easy conversion tool, and would this make any difference to the result? --Philcha (talk) 15:59, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * See Preparing images for upload for the why's. It's not a rule that this an image of this type must be SVG, but it's widely recognized that it should be and many are listed in Category:Images that should be in SVG format. The leaf image was done with Inkscape and that's a popular choice for WP.--RDBury (talk) 17:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The easy conversion tool: Graphic Lab  TCO (reviews needed)  01:57, 19 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment I added an SVG diagram of (what appears to be) the same concept. It would be fairly easy to translate, but I'm not really sure if this diagram is really FP quality. Makeemlighter (talk) 23:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 21:07, 24 July 2011 (UTC)