Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Pseudatelus sp

Pseudatelus sp

 * Reason:Good quality and EV. High res, alternative featured at commons.
 * Articles this image appears in:Pseudatelus
 * Creator:Muhammad


 * Support as nominator --Muhammad (talk) 16:02, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Support any with preference of the original. I like the first composition, as it shows the top portion of the bug.  Zoo Fari  16:14, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Support alternate Better use of depth of field. Durova Charge! 20:34, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Support alternate Better IMO --Richard Bartz (talk) 00:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Support alt. Noodle snacks (talk) 09:49, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Support alt Iconic composition. Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 15:23, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose alt. This isn't Commons, guys. The alt image isn't used in the article and shouldn't be unless the article is significantly expanded (right now its a stub). The top picture has more EV and thus gets priority for the article. The bottom picture looks better, but has less EV. To be a featured picture, however, the image must be used in the article. Kaldari (talk) 17:17, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The alt if featured, will replace the original in the article; at least that's what usually happens. --Muhammad (talk) 19:44, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Personally, I would prefer that the original image remain in the article, as it has much higher EV. It gives you a much better idea of the shape and typical appearance of the bug. Do you guys really want the alt to the be the only image of this bug in its adult form in the article? Kaldari (talk) 20:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Then both can be used.  Zoo Fari  23:06, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Have you seen the article? Kaldari (talk) 16:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Are you saying the article is too small for an image? One more photograph can be placed in that long whitespace.  Zoo Fari  00:48, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Original I like the alternate too, but I think the original has better EV. Makeemlighter (talk) 06:15, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Seems like the alternate has it. ~  ωαdεstεr 16  «talkstalk» 06:17, 9 May 2009 (UTC)