Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Radome

Radome
Nicely illustrates Radome. - BRIAN 0918   16:35, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC) +10 / -1 -- Solipsist 16:28, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC) 
 * Nominate and support. -  BRIAN 0918   16:35, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. Beautiful! Mgm|(talk) 22:12, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support Execelent! TomStar81 23:25, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. Good. Enochlau 01:09, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support Very nice--Fir0002 04:11, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. Passes my desktop wallpaper test with flying colors. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 04:47, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. -- Solipsist 08:11, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * The red light is blurry. The people are blurry and too dark. Definitely not a quality photo. Support. --SPUI (talk) 15:45, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Joke or mistake? Mark1 02:28, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh, that support was not a mistake. No comment on the rest. --SPUI (talk) 02:58, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Ha ha. Mark1 05:22, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support- The red light is blurred because it's so much brighter than everything else it became oversaturated and the people are blurry because they're walking! Unavoidable consequences of a necessarily long exposure shot. --Deglr6328 17:36, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The red light is jarring. Mark1 05:22, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. Of course. ed g2s  &bull;  talk  14:32, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support Never mind the blurry red light. JoJan 15:04, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)