Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Rainbow

Rainbow


Striking, most of all in scale. Appears in Rainbow.


 * Nominate and support. - Zafiroblue05 22:51, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support, really nice photo. -b 23:56, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support One of the best on the article. Clear and not thin and hard to see. Well done, but where is the pot of gold? ;) --Ali K 05:12, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak support pretty picture but I wish you could have somehow captured the entire rainbow. --Every1blowz 06:17, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, it wasn't me that took it. :) That being said, trying to get whole rainbow can be impressive ([[Image:Regenbogen Zürichsee.jpg|28px]], but it often looks, per Ali K, very thin and hard to see. Zafiroblue05 06:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Its not trivial to photograph a whole rainbow. You typically need a fisheye lens, or a composite panorarma as explained in the article. --
 * You need a strong wide-angle lens.It can be a fisheye, but since the needed angle of 84° is far from 180°, it doesn't have to. --Ikar.us 06:32, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Solipsist 21:44, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. You seldom see the spectrum colors this clearly in a photo. I assume it's unretouched... --Janke | Talk 07:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support.It sorta looks too good to be true.--ragesoss 20:36, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support rainbows are hard to photograph, and photographing the entire rainbow is nigh on impossible in my experience! Nice vivid colours. chowells 01:20, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Supportfor above reasonPschemp | Talk 07:08, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Even though it doesn't show the pot of gold. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 01:33, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Excellent illustrative value. enochlau (talk) 00:32, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Either version. Great photo! Uploaded a slightly sharper version --Fir0002 10:14, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Jtkiefer T   08:49, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong support - I saw it in the article and though it should be nominated. I was surprised that it acctually is. So I came here to vote. Renata 02:02, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Wow. Impressive. Tito xd (?!? - help us) 23:50, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Raven4x4x 06:05, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

