Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Red-eyed Tree Frog

Red-eyed Tree Frog (Litoria chloris)

 * Reason:It is a clear, illustrative photo of one of Australia's most beautiful frogs. Sorry about the tonnes of frog photos, this should be the last for a while. I haven't been on wiki all summer, which is frog season!
 * Articles this image appears in:Litoria chloris and Red-eyed Tree Frog
 * Creator:liquidGhoul (talk)


 * Support as nominator liquidGhoul (talk) 05:01, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. The best frog photo I've seen in a long time. --jjron (talk) 07:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support per nom.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 09:01, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose Cute, but - DOF is pretty shallow, and what's that between his (her?) legs? --Janke | Talk 11:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * A leaf. --liquidGhoul (talk) 12:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Is there a way top clone out the leaf in the middle? That would make it FP quality. Juliancolton (Talk) 13:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It doesn't look like a hard job, I'll give it a go tomorrow. --liquidGhoul (talk) 13:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Conditional support once leaf is cloned out. &mdash; BRIAN 0918 &bull; 2008-02-18 14:29Z
 * Support. Unclear which of two leaves Brian is referring to. Neither bothers me. Samsara (FA • FP) 18:00, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ribbit (translates as support). Durova Charge! 18:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support either Wow! --Muhammad (talk) 18:58, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support version 2. It's better without the leaf. Ilikefood (talk) 20:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support (prefer v2), beautiful composition, lighting and focus. —Pengo 20:21, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1 Very good, now that the leaf is gone. Juliancolton (Talk) 22:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support either Ryan shell (talk) 23:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1, good picture, glad the leaf is gone.D-rew (talk) 03:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

MER-C 08:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC)