Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Red Sand Garden

Red Sand Garden
An attractive high quality panoramic image of the Red Sand Garden in the newly opened Australian Garden at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Cranbourne, Victoria, Australia. This image was taken back in June 2006, just a month after the Australian Garden opened and before the spring growth and changes.

It was taken in the late winter afternoon to avoid the crowds and to capture the best lighting and shadows on the dunes and across the gardens. While this has adversely affected the sky on the left where the sun was setting, in my opinion that does not diminish the encyclopaedic information or quality of the image as the garden itself is beautifully lit. Incidentally, in case anyone's wondering, the curve of the path and wall are real, not an artifact of the creation of the panorama.
 * Self-nominate and support. --jjron 06:46, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * - In general, the composition is sort of lacking. A closer crop might be better.  Beyond composition, the left-hand side of the image has blown highlights and the very top-left corner has a strip of black pixels&mdash;I would assume its a remnant of cropping a stitched image.  drumguy8800   C   T  09:27, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Well spotted on that black line - in all the times I've looked at this I'd honestly never noticed that before, but easily enough fixed. Closer cropping overall however would reduce the encyclopaedic value of the image - I guess 'composition' can be a personal preference. --jjron 07:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. I have updated the image to remove the strip of black pixels at the top lefthand corner - if you still see them please purge your cache or refresh the page (since this was a genuine flaw in the picture I simply overwrote it rather than posting an new 'edit'). --jjron 08:16, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose nice but per above, the black strip of black pixels is very unattractive. Consider cropping it. &mdash; Arjun  14:53, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Support I don't know why they're complaining about a line that's just a couple of centimeters long. It's a beatiful picture to me. Just to make them happy I would just crop that line out.-- ¿  Why  1  9  9  1  ESP. | Sign Here 15:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Very Strong Support; if that line at the top-left hand corner is removed, I'll change my vote. -- Alt  iris   Exeunt  07:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * To what? Super duper insanely strong mega support? --Dschwen 13:37, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Haha, nicely put. Don't take this too harshly Altiris, but maybe kill the over the top voting except for truly exceptional cases. "Extreme support" and the like aren't commonly used on FPC --Fir0002 01:50, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll try my best to take that into effect, Fir. Bear in mind that I'm new to voting in FPC, so my opinions are pretty high initially. However, you can be rest assured that my votes will be...ahh, what's that phrase...harder to earn as time goes on. This does not mean that I give Extreme Support for no reason, though. As long as the image is exceptional in my opinion, it gets my vote. -- Alt  iris   Exeunt  10:09, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Exactly, quite understandable for someone new, and I'm glad you took the comment in the right spirit --Fir0002 22:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Weak Support The colors (red sand and blue sky) work well together - shame about the blown highlights losing this on the LHS --Fir0002 01:48, 1 January 2007 (UTC) MER-C 12:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The clouds seem to change hue from pinkish white to mustardy white about 1/3 into the picture (from the left). Is that the "adverse effect"? Fixable? ~ trialsanderrors 10:08, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The sky is very inhomogeneneously exposed. The blown out part on the left is rather unattractive. I don't like the composition either, too much of the path in the foreground. And shame on you for stepping into the bushes ;-) . --Dschwen 13:37, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I didn't; it was taken from underneath the visitor's centre building - see here for a shot looking back the other way. --jjron 07:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose The colours are really striking, but the blown out white on the left makes it less than featured for me. (is 'inhomogeneneously' a real word?) Bobanny 22:17, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * No, I believe it is inhomogenenenoeouslysome. Anyways I was referring to the brightness changes across the sky :-) --Dschwen 11:28, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support okay now that the strip of black is gone I am willing to support but also per Fir. &mdash; Arjun  14:10, 1 January 2007 (UTC)