Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/River pollution

River pollution

 * Reason:Rivers often become polluted for excess human activity. This image is showing that fact, this image is showing a rubbish-laden river with slums.
 * Articles this image appears in:River
 * Creator:originally posted to Flickr as Meanwhile, 1 mile away...


 * Support as nominator  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 22:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Oppose what is this? Poor quality, not to mention it is way too snapshotty. It isn't even of a particular subject. All-around not FP quality. Juliancolton The storm still blows...  22:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The image is about river pollution and slums adjusent to river.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 22:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * River pollution? That is not an FP worthy subject. And above all, the technical quality isn't good. Juliancolton The storm still blows...  22:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * River pollution is not FP worthy? You are saying only a nice image of a river will be FP worthy, not the negative aspect like pollution?  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 22:51, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Not rive pollution as a whole, but just the way this image illustrates it. Juliancolton The storm still blows...  23:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose River pollution is a fine subject for FP, but this particular photo is not FP quality. Not the best composition and there's all sorts of weird chromatic aberration and other things that seem strange-looking but I don't know the technical names for. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It shows sulms adjoining river.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 23:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose due to poor focus and lighting. Highly reproducible shots like this should be much higher quality/resolution.   Cacophony (talk) 05:33, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose technically really poor/nothing for FP. —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 22:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

MER-C 05:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)