Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Rudolf Brazda

Rudolf Brazda
Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2019  at 00:49:19 (UTC)
 * Reason:First of all, this nomination is biased, this is the LGBT month and since I'm part of the community I needed to find a picture which seemed fine for FPC standards and I found this image of last surviving gay prisoner of Nazi Germany nice and tender.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Rudolf Brazda
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/People/Others
 * Creator:Jean-Luc SCHWAB


 * Support as nominator – LLcentury (talk) 00:49, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:55, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose I understand the sentiment, but this is just a snapshot. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:38, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't agree but profusely respect your position. --LLcentury (talk) 10:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Support, although I see Charles' point. I think the EV makes up for a average photo. He died in 2011, so the situation, especially as regards copyright, is now fixed in place for a fairly long while. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.7% of all FPs 11:13, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Charlesjsharp, and also on technical grounds; overexposed, severely blown highlights. --Janke | Talk 12:25, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose - blown highlights. MER-C 16:42, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Clarification - what exactly is "blown highlights"?, I am not questioning it, I don't understand the concept in English, I speak Spanish. So to look carefully at "blown highlights" in potential future candidates. Kindest regards! --LLcentury (talk) 19:42, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Areas of the image which have a color value of (255, 255, 255). See Clipping (photography). MER-C 19:50, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * "Blown highlights" means that the lighter parts of the photo are overexposed - in this case, the pink shirt has turned white, with no details in the lighter parts. --Janke | Talk 19:51, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose per summary of problems given by Charles and Janke. Geoffroi (talk) 04:37, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose Blown highlights are quite distracting, making the picture seem unencyclopedic. Mattximus (talk) 21:25, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Support.-- Vulp here  14:38, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose. This just looks like a random family snapshot to me. I recognize the EV and likely unreplaceability but there needs to be some threshold for quality of the pictures themselves. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:46, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment – I missed the blown highlights, it sort of blends in with the bright shirt. There are better compositions of him in google search results, I doubt any of them have the license or the resolution. Bammesk (talk) 03:19, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 02:09, 4 July 2019 (UTC)