Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Salzburg Panorama

Salzburg Panorama


This is an old panorama of Salzburg, Austria that I took back in 2004. It is a panorama of 4 segments taken with my Canon 10D. Thought I might give it a run through FPC.


 * Nominate and support. - Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 16:20, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Great detail, very interesting. --Pharaoh Hound 17:17, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support; well lit, perfect stiching: another great Dillif panorama! smurrayinch e  ster( User ), ( Talk ) 18:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Excellent set of pictures used to create a brilliant panorama. --Wisd e n17 22:28, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. beautifully illustrates the layout and setting of the town. Ori Livneh (talk..contribs) 23:24, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Wonderful clarity. Strong support if this shows most or all of the town (I don't know if it does). Tewy 01:19, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support gorgeous -- Samir  धर्म 06:11, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support great composition --Astrokey 44 12:06, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Majestic shot with a lot of detail. &mdash; Vildricianus 15:44, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Very good job of stitching what must have been some difficult photos. Staxringold talkcontribs 20:17, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Excellent! --Nebular110 02:31, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Excellent panorama! Hurricanehink ( talk ) 02:36, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support Either, with preference for my edit. Lovely countryside --Fir0002 03:54, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support original since I don't see any clear difference, and no explanation is given for the edit. --Janke | Talk 19:22, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Orig, for all I know he could have hidden Waldo in the edit...:p-Ravedave 20:09, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Haha, thats what I was thinking. He has a habit of making unnecessary changes and doesn't always disclose them - people may be supporting an edit that contains changes they're not even aware of and that bothers me. Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 22:54, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, I can see a slight increase in color saturation... --Janke | Talk 08:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * And the prize goes to Janke ... --Fir0002 08:52, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I could see it too. ;) As I said, its what I can't see that bothers me. I may inadvertently support an unwanted change that I'm not aware of if it is not disclosed. Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 09:06, 26 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Support either great picture-- Ch ild zy ( Talk 20:13, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Wonderful all-encompassing view.  Jo  e  I  13:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support either. Having been on that very fortress a week ago, I can attest that this picture captures the view very well.--Eloquence* 10:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. I like these ones. - Darwinek 21:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Raven4x4x 07:31, 1 July 2006 (UTC)