Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Sentosa Shrubs

Sentosa Shrubs


This picture was photographed by me and it appears in Sentosa, the article. The words are displayed very clearly and not too bright, either. The palms that "flank" the shrubs give a "panoramic" impression.
 * Nominate and support. - 陈  鼎  翔    贡献  Chat with Tdxiang on IRC!10:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support - Serados 10:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose - sorry, not gonna pass. Blurry, washed-out colors.--Zambaccian 11:04, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Unsharp in full size, composition not very good. --Janke | Talk 11:07, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Not sharp enough, distracting shadow in foreground (a croup would go a long way), and distracting shadow over the S. What's it a photo *of* anyway? If it's the SENTOSA plants, then it's too far away. If it's the whole entry to the visitor's centre, then it's just not interesting enough - fairly bland flowers, not enough to look at. Stevage 11:26, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Too blurry. --Pharaoh Hound 12:58, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. For reasons above. --Life is like a box of chocolates 19:44, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Blurry. Mikeo 19:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Sorry, have to agree with what's been said above. --jjron 09:24, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Blurred - Adrian Pingstone 14:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Reasons above. --Mad Max 04:22, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose bad quality, poor exposure.-- Andeh 01:19, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose blurry Anonymous  _anonymous_  Have a Nice Day  21:17, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Support Nice Resort-like feeling, but the colours are strange, and its too blurry.Advanced 17:16, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Poorly framed, with exposure problems. Alexj2002 22:32, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

-- moondigger 02:40, 18 June 2006 (UTC)