Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Shanghai Grand Hyatt Atrium.jpg

Shanghai Grand Hyatt Atrium.jpg
An impressive picture showing a titillating piece of architecture. Might needs a bit of color adjustment/cleaning, but I can't do it here at college. - Circeus 18:05, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)

+7 / -5 -- Solipsist 16:19, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 
 * Nominate and support. - Circeus 18:05, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * I could go for this one. Support. Perhaps cropping out the glaring lights at the left side. Jonas Olson 18:33, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Support if and only if cropped per Jonas. Neutralitytalk 22:02, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * I've cropped the image. Anyone can see the original version on the image's page.  Support cropped version.  -- brian0918  &#153;  23:15, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I took the original picture and support the improved version. Lawrence Lavigne 00:14, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. I think a square crop would be effective on this one. --jacobolus (t) 22:48, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * oppose. im sure it is magestic and great view but, like almost all pics straight up or down, perspective is lost and i have to imagine how this looks rather than seeing it clearly displayed. Cavebear42 00:06, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Agree with Cavebear42. --Bernard Helmstetter 12:38, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Agree with Cavebear42. Enochlau 14:01, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. Reminiscent of an Andreas Gursky photograph. You don't have to understand the structure, enjoy the pattern. -- Solipsist 19:06, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * In fact, if I am not mistaken, it looks like Gursky has also photographed this building, but chose a different perspective . -- Solipsist 19:11, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose - just doesn't excite or interest me - Adrian Pingstone 08:34, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Somewhat intruiging in its pattern, but otherwise insipid and uninteresting. - Sango123 23:38, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)