Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Small Red Rose

Small Red Rose.JPG

 * Reason:a very pretty and detailed image
 * Articles this image appears in:Rose
 * Creator:user Libera on the wikimedia commons

MER-C 04:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Support as nominator &mdash; Barry O'Brien    entretien  02:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment, needs better caption gren グレン 10:41, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Rather than criticising why dont you suggest alternatives? --HadzTalk 11:45, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Shallow DOF, resulting from a poor exposure solution, crop too tight. - Alvesgaspar 15:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose' I would agree that the DOF may be small but I dont even see the focal area shallow or otherwise. The whole picture is strangely muddy probably from motion. Its also not particularly striking. -Fcb981 15:41, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose: I fail to see how this contributes to the quality of an article. Plus it has JPEG artifacts.  ~   St ep  tr ip   18:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Not a clear picture. Witty lama 01:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose per above and tight crop.--HereToHelp 02:24, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose - lovely picture, but out of focus and full of specks. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 09:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Nothing special about this picture, and it is not very good quality, nor does it display much photographic technique. Althepal 21:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)