Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Sri Mulyani

Sri Mulyani Indrawati
Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2011 at 05:44:08 (UTC)
 * Reason:High quality, PD, and an underrepresented subject (Indonesian people)
 * Articles in which this image appears:Sri Mulyani Indrawati; Second United Indonesia Cabinet
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/People/Political
 * Creator:International Monetary Fund


 * Support as nominator --Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:44, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Support good portrait of a notable person. Pinetalk 12:19, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. JJ Harrison (talk) 11:26, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Support as above. J Milburn (talk) 15:40, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose good facial expression and colour scheme, but low limited EV as is still a simple official passport-photo style image not revealing anything about the subject's occupation (notability), character or any particular historical event. --Elekhh (talk) 00:43, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Many of our FPs don't show the subject in a work environment. Some are promotional shots, some are posed and shot by Wikipedians, some are from Flickr and have a random tree as a background, and some are official portraits from the IMF. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I know that is the status quo, but my position has been consistent on this over the years, and I acknowledge that is a minority opinion. I find images which show more than just passive physical appearance, have more EV, like this or this or this. Maybe was harsh to say "low EV" so reworded that. --Elekhh (talk) 01:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I'd kill maim  beg give away free chocolate sundaes to get a good picture of Garin Nugroho, Nia Di Nata, or Ucu Agustin] on set but... meh, not likely. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:21, 30 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Support Boring but undoubted EV --Muhammad (talk) 03:02, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Very nicely done - per nom.  Royal broil  03:04, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Elekhh Featured should be more than just good enough. Featured should never be boring. Saffron Blaze (talk) 04:22, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 04:26, 31 December 2011 (UTC)