Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Stop Online Piracy Act Blackout

The People Petition for a Redress of Greivences
Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2015  at 20:42:29 (UTC)
 * Reason:A historical moment in history is captured here, a moment when websites, protestors, politicians, and orginzations united to kill the SOPA bill. Pictured here is Wikipedia's 24-hour blackout screenshot, which as near as I can gather is freely licensed save but for the logo that appears in the screenshot. I've noted that the image is on the commons, so I presume that the screenshot is therefore eligible for inclusion in the FPC process, if this is incorrect then I apologize. I will also note that the image is smaller than the currently mandated 1500x1500 size requirements, but I am asking for leniency here as this was a pivotal moment in combating internet censorship and I feel that as such the community owes it to this nom to adopt an IAR stance in lew of what images like this one accomplished on 18-19 January 2012.
 * Articles in which this image appears:PROTECT IP Act, Stop Online Piracy Act
 * FP category for this image:Hard to say. Best guess: Other
 * Creator:Wikipedia (someone probably knows, so I would expect that to be cleared up soon), screenshot uploaded by User:Midnightblueowl, then edited by Dark Attsios.


 * Support as nominator – TomStar81 (Talk) 20:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Regretful Oppose - Though its under CC-By-SA-3.0, the resolution is below par. So oppose. Yeh! admit an important screen shot and no possible retake, still below the FP quality. - The Herald (here I am) 15:03, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Support Alt - Good to go as the possible retake is available. - The Herald (here I am) 07:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Support Presuming this is the native resolution - it might be possible to get it on a larger screen, but... - then I think this is in the same boat as video game screenshots: any larger and it's misleading. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:57, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment It's still available, so a retake is possible: https://en.wikipedia.org/?banner=blackout — Preceding unsigned comment added by FakeShemp (talk • contribs) 16:12, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I've provided it, but given how it scales, I have to ask if it's worth it. Also support alt, but prefer original Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:11, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Support Original The alt is essentially just the original with the extra resolution padded in black. In this case, the resolution requirement adds nothing (the extra resolution does not give extra detail, the main features of the banner are of essentially fixed resolution), and should be waived. MChesterMC (talk) 11:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Support Original The alt adds nothing of value. Rreagan007 (talk) 17:16, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * You know, my first reaction was "...That's a bit harsh" then I realised "Wait, I agree, and I'm the uploader." =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Support both. Historical moment.  Jim Car ter  12:37, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 23:03, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Only the original has enough support for promotion. Added image to Featured pictures/History/Others. Armbrust The Homunculus 23:03, 16 February 2015 (UTC)