Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Strata Center delist

Strata Center
This isn't a terrible illustration but it's a bit lacking against today's FP standards: it seems tilted, the building is cut off at top left, the lamp-posts and overhanging branch in the foreground are distracting, most of the subject is in shadow and the brightly lit parts are blown. The image quality is pretty average and this version is also short of the resolution requirements (although Raul654 could probably provide a higher-res copy, I suspect the image quality of this would be poor, as the original was taken with what is now a fairly old, point-and-shoot 3.3MP digicam). It's been POTD twice and I suspect it's had its turn now - we should easily be able to get a better shot if we want a Strata Center FP.


 * Nominate for delisting --YFB ¿  02:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delist aberation visible even on down-sampled version (less than 1/4 original size), low dynamic range, not up to today's standard -- antilived T 11:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delist just on lighting alone I would delist. --Bridgecross 14:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delist per nom. --KFP (talk | contribs) 23:52, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delist per nom. Sharkface217 01:24, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delist - it's Stata, btw, not Strata. Do we want a replacement? I'll be near it in January. Debivort 03:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * My numerous bads. I blame the geologists =). I won't move it now to save confusion, but apologies for not correctly calibrating my Mk.1 eyeball. A replacement would be excellent if you get the chance! --YFB ¿  03:42, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delist - good call, although it would be a shame to see it gone. If Debivort could get a good replacement, upload it with a name that makes more sense, then we could feature it, delete this old one and be done! —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 14:24, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delist per nom -- mcshadypl T C  03:37, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Delisted. --KFP (talk | contribs) 14:48, 26 December 2006 (UTC)