Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Supermarine Spitfire Mk XVI NR.jpg

Hawker Hurricane


A fine picture I found on the French Wikipedia´s Featured Pictures. --Tobyw87 12:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral Doesn't seem particularly striking to me, although I suspect the resolution and overall quality is good (apart from the blown highlights that someones bound to bring up). Terri G 14:39, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Sorry but really it's out of focus, and is pretty grainy. &mdash; Arjun 14:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Compare to [[Media:Supermarine_Spitfire_Mk_XVI_NR.jpg|this]] FP warbird. --Bridgecross 16:54, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Not sharp enough (and I took it!!) - Adrian Pingstone 23:44, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose I really like it and was going to support it until I click on the link that Brisgecross made above. It just isn't as clear as it needs to be a Featured Picture. 00:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I've looked through the French Wikipedia's FPs, and about have wouldn't make it here. This is just an example. | A ndonic O  Talk 02:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Grainy, uninteresting. Other pictures of planes are striking and very visually appealling.  This picture lacks that.  --Midnight Rider 03:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * OpposeIt is boring and grainy. Good for the article though Baseracer 02:25, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Too grainy. Due to there being many stunning plane pictures out there, it has to be very good to get past FPC. Nautica Shad e  s  20:02, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Raven4x4x 05:31, 13 January 2007 (UTC)