Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Synagogue on D-Day

Synagogue on D-Day

 * Reason:The Library of Congress has several photographs from houses of worship on D-Day. The sign above the entrance on this example makes the occasion unmistakable.  There's something in the faces of these three people; an understated image.  Restored version of File:Synagogue D-Day.jpg.
 * Articles this image appears in: History of the Jews in the United States, United States home front during World War II
 * Creator:United States Farm Security Administration


 * Support as nominator -- Durova Charge! 19:36, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Support GerardM (talk) 10:49, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Xxjubilee18 (talk) 13:38, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Support, but why is this page transcluded on the image page? Chick Bowen 21:03, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Because Durova messed up the FPC template. :P Fixed. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 12:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Oops, thank you. :) Durova Charge! 17:01, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Support - historically significant, EV, great quality. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 12:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak support The photo lacks visual impact, but it is very interesting and meets the FPC. Nick-D (talk) 23:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose more or less per Nick-D. This photo just doesn't seem terribly compelling visually to me. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:24, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Calliopejen1. --  matt3591  T C  20:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Neutral Interesting photo, but I'm not convinced of its EV. Makeemlighter (talk) 06:20, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose: I'm also not convinced of its EV and the sign making it "unmistakable" is a drawback, in my opinion.  Mae din \talk 12:28, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Calliopejen1. --Banzoo (talk) 22:26, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Support. It's a useful contribution to the articles it's in, and an interesting (if not particularly compelling, composition-wise) shot.--ragesoss (talk) 03:16, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Support per Ragesoss. NW ( Talk ) ( How am I doing? ) 05:05, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

MER-C 10:25, 11 May 2009 (UTC)