Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/The Thin Red Line

The Thin Red Line
Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2016 at 21:21:34 (UTC)
 * Reason:In a curious military coincidence, this precedes The Thin Red Line and both films based on it. Excellent resolution.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Canada in Khaki, Harold H. Piffard, Remembrance Day, Remembrance poppy
 * FP category for this image:Artwork/Others
 * Creator:Harold H. Piffard


 * Support as nominator – Brandmeistertalk  21:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose for now. Text is bleeding through at the borders, some spots have blown highlights, and there's a spot where the paper moved away from the scanner which needs fixing. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Conditional oppose per Chris. Can be switched if improvements are made. --Tremonist (talk) 13:41, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Not sure whether I see all the stated defective spots, so maybe Adam Cuerden would be interested in this. Brandmeistertalk  20:28, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Scan's good enough, I think, to justify a restoration. Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:34, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The black shadow at the top left corner appears to be where the paper curved away from the scanner. I've seen the same thing in the books I've scanned. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:52, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Comparing it with the first upload helps.... perhaps scan can be improved. Bammesk (talk) 00:54, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Not a great scan of fairly poor quality print. While this may be the original format it was published in I don't think it has sufficient EV to make up for the lack of quality. - Wolftick (talk) 23:58, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Uploaded restoration as Alt 1; Support Alt Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * as well, Crisco 1402 is his ancestor. Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:32, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I am a wizened man now, indeed. What about the lines along the top border? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:17, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * You mean the colours at the top of the border? That's typical of this type of printing for border lines. Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:46, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Adam. Considering it's a WWI stuff I think the print condition is ok. Brandmeistertalk  09:20, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't mean the part where the ink ran outside of the lines (that's fine). I meant that it appears there is some text / image bleed through along the top border. It's not present at the bottom. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:12, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, right. Subtle, but there. I'd say that was more dirt, or subtle shadows caused by the binding. It's easily removed. Give me a minute. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:06, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I've fixed it, methinks. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:39, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Original and Alt have darker shades in mid and upper left areas compared to the first upload . Do we have a good scan? Bammesk (talk) 02:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * From my experience with 1910s illustrations, the very pale text of the caption is evidence that the very light shades in the first upload is down to a bad, blurry scan. Dark blue is typical for a lot of illustrations in this period, a pale blue simply doesn't happen. I believe the original is simply a very bad scan (well, probably a bad photo) of the same exact source image. I'd say disregard it. Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:57, 28 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Support ALT - Looks much nicer now. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:25, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Support ALT – Bammesk (talk) 03:20, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Support ALT - Godot13 (talk) 04:02, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Support ALT - --Janke | Talk 12:14, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 22:40, 3 January 2016 (UTC)