Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/The unlucky Ophiucus Set (3)

The unlucky Ophiucus Set (3)
Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2015  at 08:47:44 (UTC)


 * Reason:First nom and second nom failed due to unexplained(?) reasons. So here again are a quality set of astro images used in Ophiucus...
 * Articles in which this image appears:Ophiucus
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Space/Looking out
 * Creators:Please see file description


 * Support as nominator – The Herald : here I am 08:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Support - Maybe 3rd time's the charm. Rreagan007 (talk) 17:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Support Magnificent images! JJARichardson (talk) 18:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Support - third time. Hafspajen (talk) 14:32, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Conditional Support Scale down the first (by NASA), because at 10Kx10K pixels, it is very unsharp (possibly upscaled? On the WISE page, it's sharpest at only a bit over 1Kx1K !) 3Kx3K should be more than enough, and won't lose any detail at all - the full-sized is that fuzzy! --Janke | Talk 21:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * But I am sure to lose some details by scaling down, specially when it comes to astro images. There is a reason why they have high-scaled version. Those stars are too minute to see even to telescopic eyes... - The Herald (here I am) 13:53, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Did you look at the first image full-size? Waste of bandwidth, IMO... ;-) (Note though, that I do not oppose!) --Janke | Talk 15:19, 20 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Support Once Again - National Names 2000 (talk) 04:07, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 13:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC) --Armbrust The Homunculus 13:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC) --Armbrust The Homunculus 13:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)